June 2027 defence · decision workspace
From — projects to one defensible master’s thesis.
A verified project inventory translated into ranked research directions, methods, fallbacks and professor-ready outreach—without confusing engineering effort with academic contribution.
Share-safe view: private paths, session IDs and raw evidence are excluded.
Critical path
Three dates frame the decision.
Official University of Tartu Institute of Computer Science schedule for the intended defence cycle.
Empirical calibration
What recent UT Data Science theses actually look like
Exact curriculum metadata, public thesis files and abstract-level coding replace guesswork about reasonable scope.
The practical bar
One bounded question, a credible comparison, and an evaluated result.
Registry membership shows defended scope—not grade, thesis quality or official endorsement of this ranking.
Decision board
Ranked thesis shortlist
Six weighted dimensions plus existing leverage. Select up to three candidates to compare side by side.
0 selectedChoose up to three candidates
Professor-ready
Six research proposals, not app ideas
Each direction has falsifiable questions, explicit baselines, a measurable method and a minimum defensible result.
Complete inventory
Explore every verified project
Search, filter and distinguish project maturity from thesis potential.
—projects shown
Next action
Build a focused supervisor email
Choose one primary direction and one related backup. The draft stays editable after copying; nothing is sent from this page.
No professor has been contacted and no topic has been registered.
Draft — not sent
Trust & provenance
What “verified” means here
Evidence-backed coverage with the uncertainty left visible.
Known boundaries
100-point thesis-fit model
Research-question clarity20
DS / AI centrality20
Original contribution15
Data + artifact readiness15
Evaluation feasibility15
Finishability10
Existing leverage5